oneVcard vs. Uniqode (ehemals Beaconstac)
oneVcard 91 /100 
Uniqode (ehemals Beaconstac) 75 /100 oneVcard and Uniqode (formerly Beaconstac) compete in different weight classes, even though both address enterprise teams. oneVcard is a German provider from oneVcard GmbH and hosts both operations and development exclusively in Germany, in an ISO 27001 certified data center in Nürnberg, mirrored redundantly to Frankfurt, with no transfer to third countries. Uniqode, by contrast, is a US SaaS provider headquartered in New York with a development site in Bengaluru, India, that by its own account serves over 50,000 companies and focuses primarily on QR codes and digital business cards for large organizations.
Both platforms come with a mature enterprise foundation: central admin consoles, role-based permissions, SSO via SAML and integration with Microsoft Entra ID, SCIM provisioning, Apple/Google Wallet, analytics, lead capture and open APIs. The decisive difference for German and European B2B buyers lies not in the feature scope but in data sovereignty: Uniqode stores and processes customer data exclusively in the USA and has neither an EU nor a Germany hosting option, whereas oneVcard makes exactly this point the core of its offering.
In the overall rating, oneVcard clearly leads with 91 out of 100 points ahead of Uniqode with 75 out of 100.
Category by category
| Category | oneVcard | Uniqode (ehemals Beaconstac) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR & Data Security 25% | 94 | 62 | oneVcard |
| Enterprise Integration (SSO/SCIM/MDM/API) 20% | 88 | 82 | oneVcard |
| Team & Admin Management 17% | 92 | 90 | oneVcard |
| Feature Scope 15% | 92 | 78 | oneVcard |
| Support & Language 11% | 90 | 58 | oneVcard |
| User Reviews 12% | 90 | 82 | oneVcard |
Detailed feature comparison
Ratings and ranking follow our methodology. We deliberately do not list prices, as they change frequently and are not transparently and fully available for all providers – please ask the respective provider directly for current terms. As of the respective review, all information without guarantee.
| Criterion | oneVcard | Uniqode (ehemals Beaconstac) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 91 | 75 |
| Server location Germany | ✓ | – |
| EU hosting available | ✓ | – |
| German hosting company | ✓ | – |
| Developed in the DACH region | ✓ | – |
| DPA under Art. 28 GDPR | ✓ | ? |
| Subprocessors only in the EU | ✓ | – |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ |
| SOC 2 | ? | ✓ |
| SSO (SAML) | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO (OIDC) | ✓ | ✓ |
| SCIM provisioning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Managed App Config (MDM) | ? | ? |
| Public API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microsoft Entra ID / Azure AD | ✓ | ✓ |
| Number of integrations | 20 | 15 |
| Email signature management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Outlook signature integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Physical NFC cards | ✓ | – |
| Apple & Google Wallet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Central team/admin console | ✓ | ✓ |
| Granular roles & permissions | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-labeling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom domain | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom CSS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflows / automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lead capture / scanner | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connect function (contacts) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Paper card scanner | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier | ✓ | ✓ |
| German-language support | ✓ | ? |
| SLA guarantee | ✓ | ✓ |
| External avg. rating | 4.9/5 | 4.5/5 |
Verdict
For companies based in Germany or the EU, oneVcard is the clearly more advisable choice, not because Uniqode would be functionally weak, but because oneVcard gets the choices that are critical under data protection law right. oneVcard hosts in an ISO 27001 certified data center in Nürnberg and develops exclusively in Germany, forgoes any third-country transfer, and offers on request a data processing agreement under Art. 28 GDPR, an external data protection officer, daily backups, 2FA and regular penetration tests. On the enterprise side, oneVcard is in no way inferior to Uniqode: SSO via SAML 2.0, Entra ID and Google Workspace, automatic user provisioning, a dedicated email signature management with a certified Outlook add-in, over 20 integrations (SAP, Personio, Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics 365 among others) as well as physical NFC cards.
The latter Uniqode does not sell at all; there NFC is only a sharing method. Added to this are German-language support and transparent euro prices (Premium plan).
Uniqode has undeniable strengths that must be named fairly: on independent user reviews the platform performs excellently (G2 around 4.9/5), its adoption is enormous with over 50,000 companies, and the compliance basis of SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022 and HIPAA is solid; for US-heavy or internationally broadly positioned corporations Uniqode can be a fitting option. For GDPR-sensitive German B2B customers, however, the US-only hosting together with the CLOUD Act risk and the unclear data processing agreement situation remains a potential knockout criterion that oneVcard simply does not have.
In the pure GDPR category oneVcard leads with 94 out of 100; this is the essential reason for its overall lead.
Comparison FAQ
Where is the data hosted with oneVcard and Uniqode?
This is the central difference. oneVcard hosts exclusively in Germany, primarily in an ISO 27001 certified data center in Nürnberg, mirrored redundantly to Frankfurt, without any transfer to third countries. Development also takes place in Germany.
Uniqode, by contrast, stores and processes customer data exclusively in the USA; an EU or Germany hosting option is not available. Uniqode's privacy policy explicitly points to storage and transfer to the USA, which raises third-country transfer and CLOUD Act questions for German B2B customers.
Does oneVcard meet the GDPR better than Uniqode?
For German and European companies, yes. oneVcard offers a data processing agreement under Art. 28 GDPR on request, an external data protection officer (Prof. Dr. Eberhard Schott), daily backups, 2FA and regular penetration tests, with hosting exclusively in Germany. Uniqode is indeed SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certified and, by its own account, GDPR compliant, but in its GDPR communication it positions itself rather as a data controller; a customer-side data processing agreement available by default is not clearly verifiable.
Together with the US-only hosting, oneVcard comes out clearly better in the GDPR category (94 vs. significantly lower).
Does Uniqode have its own advantages over oneVcard?
Yes, and they should be named honestly. Uniqode receives very good ratings on independent review portals, around 4.9/5 on G2, and according to the provider is used by over 50,000 companies, which speaks for broad market adoption.
The compliance basis of SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022 and HIPAA is strong, as is the mature enterprise identity stack with SSO, SCIM and Entra ID integration. For internationally broad or US-heavy organizations without strict EU data residency requirements, Uniqode can therefore be a sensible choice.
Do I get physical NFC cards and email signature management with both providers?
With oneVcard yes, with Uniqode only to a limited extent. oneVcard sells physical NFC cards and offers a dedicated email signature management as its own product, with centralized Outlook / Microsoft 365 signatures, an officially certified Outlook add-in and HR-based population. Uniqode does support email signature integration and Apple/Google Wallet, but does not sell its own physical NFC cards; there NFC is merely a sharing method.
In addition, Uniqode bills exclusively in USD and only annually, whereas oneVcard offers transparent euro prices (Premium plan with annual payment) and German-language support.
Request a direct consultation with the test winner
Planning a company-wide rollout of digital business cards? Request a free, no-obligation consultation with our test winner oneVcard.